sarasvati: A white lotus flower floating on water. (Default)
[personal profile] sarasvati
Uwe Boll first sickened me when I found out he hired hookers to be in his movies because they were cheaper than actors, even just to play extras.

Then he does this.

Is there a way in which this isn't supposed to be offensive? I mean, I can't even chalk this one up to some misguided attempt. This is just pure horrific crap.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-26 10:26 am (UTC)
gehayi: (joanneannoyed (silver_sunn101))
From: [personal profile] gehayi
Of course it's offensive...not to mention exploitative, tacky, stupid, and mockworthy. It's UWE BOLL.

My guess is that he's probably doing exactly what he always does--making a horrible movie and getting people to invest in it. If it succeeds (and there are assholes who would probably find this either funny or fetish fuel), he's not out much financially; and if it fails (as he probably expects it to) it's a tax write-off for him and for his investors.

Profile

sarasvati: A white lotus flower floating on water. (Default)
Sarasvati

August 2011

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios