sarasvati: A white lotus flower floating on water. (Default)
Sarasvati ([personal profile] sarasvati) wrote 2010-09-28 04:25 pm (UTC)

Attitudes like that forum poster make things worse. Quite honestly, even if I could afford to buy a coffee at Starbucks every morning (assuming I liked coffee, that is), I wouldn't on principle, since I dislike their company. I don't have cable TV either, and even if right now I can't afford it, when I could afford it I didn't have it because there was too little worth watching and not enough free time to watch it anyway. But when a lot of people start thinking that the standard "living zone" begins at being able to buy $4 drinks in the morning and spend money on things you won't use enough, there's a serious problem.

People also seem to have a problem accepting the lifestyles of those who aren't blatant consumerists, too. The shift in attitude from penny-pinching to spending money all over the place isn't really a good one. I noticed during the US recession that it was people who had practiced frugality for years who didn't have much of a change in their standard of living, if any change came at all, and a lot of them were doing very well for themselves.

Hell, I went for years without a cell phone, figuring that for the amount of calls I make when I'm outside, spending 25 cents on a payphone would be cheaper than $30 a month for a cell phone just made the most financial sense. The only reason I have a cell phone now is because my mother offered to pay for it until I get a job again, and an emergency last winter in which a cell phone would have been very handy convinced me that it would be foolish of me to refuse that offer.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting